Page 79 - Magyar Gasztroenterológiai Társaság 2020. november 6–7. – ONLINE KONGRESSZUS
P. 79

Előadáskivonatok / Abstracts

             Introduction:       Endoscopic        retrograde   Results: Successful cannulation in all native papilla cases
             cholangiopancreatography  (ERCP)  is  recommended  in   with biliary indications were achieved in 1709/1871 (91.3%)
             acute biliary pancreatitis (ABP) when cholangitis or ongoing   cases. The success rate was 85.9% (650/756) if advanced
             common bile duct obstruction is present. The inflammation of   cannulation cases were considered. In 207 cases pancreatic
             the  pancreas and the surrounding tissues might make the   guidewire  and  in  549  cases  a  precut  method  was  used
             procedure more difficult.                        primarily.  The  most  used  double  guidewire  and
             Aims: We aimed to compare the outcomes and difficulty of   transpancreatic sphincterotomy techniques achieved a high
             ERCP  in  ABP  and  acute  cholangitis  (AC)  in  prospectively   and  comparable  success  rate  with  the  use  of  salvage
             collected data of 7 Hungarian tertiary centers.   methods  (53/56,  96.6%  vs.  71/72,  98.6%,  without:  41/56,
             Methods: 240 ABP cases and 250 AC cases without ABP   73.2% vs. 60/72, 83.3%) low PEP rate (0/56, 0% vs. 3/72,
             were analyzed. Previous papillotomy altered gastroduodenal   4.17%),  bleeding  rate  (1/56,  1.8%  vs.  1/72,  1.4%)  and
             anatomy, and cases with biliary stricture were excluded. The   cannulation time (639 vs. 443 s). While in the primary precut
             rate  of  successful  biliary  access,  advanced  cannulation   group,  needle  knife  fistulotomy  had  higher  success  rate
             method,  adverse  events  as  well  as  cannulation  and   compared to traditional needle knife precut (74/82, 90.2% vs.
             fluoroscopy time and subjective difficulty were compared.    353/427, 82.7%, without salvage methods: 74/82, 90.2% vs.
             Results:  No  difference  was  found  between  biliary   347/427, 81.3%), similar PEP (3/82, 3.7% vs. 13/427, 3.0%),
             cannulation  rates  in  the  two  groups  (95.8%  vs.  97.2%,   bleeding rates (0/82, 0% vs. 7/427, 1.6%), and cannulation
             p=0.409).   Significantly   more   pancreatic   guidewire   time (512 vs. 412 s). PEP developed in 2 TPS and 4 NKPP
             manipulation (31.3% vs. 17.2%; p<0.001) and prophylactic   cases  where  no  pancreatic  stent  and  indomethacin
             pancreatic stent use (19.6% vs. 4.8%; p<0.001) were seen in   suppositories were used and could have been prevented.
             the ABP than in AC group. Moreover, longer cannulation time   Conclusion:Generally  good  outcomes  in  terms  of  biliary
             in  the  ABP  patients  (248  vs.  185  s;  p=0.043)  and  higher   cannulation  success,  low  PEP  and  bleeding  rates  were
             fluoroscopy times (91 vs. 107 s; p=0.009) in the AC group   achieved even in the difficult cannulation setting according to
             were measured. There was no significant difference between   our data. However, not all opportunities to prevent PEP were
             the rate of adverse events and subjective difficulty.    utilized, highlighting the potential need for improvement.
             Conclusion: ERCP in ABP cases is more challenging than   119.   POST-ERCP   COMPLICATIONS   IN   OUR
             in  AC  but  it  does  not  affect  the  outcomes.  The  higher   DEPARTMENT   AFTER   500   EXAMINATIONS.
             frequency of difficult biliary cannulation in the ABP patients   EFFECTIVENESS  OF  RECTAL  INDOMETHACIN  IN
             warrants the involvement of an experienced endoscopist.    PROFILAXIS OF POST-ERCP PANCREATITIS.
                                                                           1
                                                                                      1
                                                                                              1
                                                                                                     1
                                                                    1
                                                              Pécsi D. , Tóth L. , Magyarosi D. , Sepsi B. , Balog I. , Kokas
             118. ADVANCED BILIARY CANNULATION STRATEGIES     M. , Pécsi G.
                                                                1
                                                                        1
             IN TERTIARY CENTERS – ANALYSIS OF 1871 NATIVE    1. Karolina Kórház - Rendelőintézet, Mosonmagyaróvár
             PAPILLA  CASES  FROM  THE  HUNGARIAN  ERCP
             REGISTRY                                         Introduction: The benefits of ERCP are well known,however
                                      1,2
                             2
                    1,2
                                                          4
                                                3
             Pécsi  D. ,  Gódi  S. ,  Hegyi  P. ,  Altorjay  I. ,  Bakucz  T. ,   is some cases we must reckon with complications.
                             3
                    5
                                                      2
                                             4
             Czakó L. , Kovács G. , Orbán-Szilágyi Á. , Pakodi F. , Patai   Aim: Review of post-ERCP complications in our department
                         5
                                             7
                                    4
               6
             Á. ,  Szepes  Z. ,  Gyökeres  T. ,  Fejes  R. ,  Dubravcsik  Z. ,   and  measure  the  effectiveness  of  rectal  indomethacin  in
                                                          8
             Vincze Á.                                        profilaxis of post-ERCP pancreatitis(PEP).
                    2
             1.  Institute  for  Translational  Medicine,  Szentágothai   Methods:  A  retrospective  study  was  condunted  in  our
             Research Center, Medical School, University of Pécs, Pécs,   department  by  patients  had  ERCP  between  2012  and
             Hungary; 2. Division of Gastroenterology, First Department   2017.We investigated the applied technique,the discovered
             of  Medicine,  Medical  School,  University  of  Pécs,  Pécs,   diagnose  and  the  possibly  appeared  complications.We
             Hungary; 3. Second Department of Medicine, University of   analysed  separately  the  group  of  patients  where  we  used
             Debrecen,   Debrecen,   Hungary;   4.   Department   of   100mg rectal indomethacin before the examination(Group I.)
             Gastroenterology,  Medical  Centre  Hungarian  Defence   and the group of patients who did not get profilaxis(Group II.).
             Forces, Budapest, Hungary; 5. First Department of Medicine,   Results:  We  performed  508  ERCP.Eight  people  were
             University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary; 6. First Department   excluded  because  the  papilla  was  not  accessible  with
             of Gastroenterology and Medicine, Markusovszky University   endoscopy.The  results  of  500  examinations  were
             Teaching  Hospital,  Szombathely,  Hungary;  7.  First   evaluated:244  examinations  in  the  group  I.  and  256
             Department of Medicine, Szent György University Teaching   examinations in group II.In the group I. PEP developed in 7
             Hospital of County Fejér, Székesfehérvár, Hungary; 8. Bács-  patients(2,88%).All of  them  was  mild,severe  PEP  was  not
             Kiskun  County  University  Teaching  Hospital,  Kecskemét,   appeared.In  the  group  II.  we  found  18  PEP(7,00%),17
             Hungary                                          patients(6,64%) with mild and 1 patient(2,88%) with severe
                                                              PEP.
             Introduction:The  use  of  advanced  biliary  cannulation   In   course   of   our   examinations   we   found   5
             methods carries a higher risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis in a   cases(1,00%)where  second  endoscopy  and  endoscopic
             setting  of  difficult  biliary  access.  Cannulation  technique   haemostasis was needed.From these cases there was only
             choice and the application of PEP prevention strategies are   1(0,20%)  where  transfusion  was  needed.Besides  these
             key to avoid complications.                      complications  we  found  1  case(0,20%)  with  other
             Aims:  Data  from  the  Hungarian  ERCP  Registry  was   complication(subcutaneous emphysema).
             analyzed  to  show  the  real-world  practice  in  7  Hungarian   From our results we highlight our 98,8% papilla canullation
             tertiary centers.                                rate,our 87% EST rate,and our needle-knife papillotomy rate
             Methods:  1871  native  papilla  cases  were  identified  with   with4,6 %.
             biliary  indications.  In  756  cases,  advanced  cannulation   Conclusion:Indomethacin  administered  before  ERCP  did
             methods were applied. Successful biliary cannulation rate,   prove  in  preventing  PEP.We  have  found  significant
             PEP  and bleeding  rate,  PEP prophylaxis  method  use  and   difference  between  the  two  groups.Comparing  our
             cannulation times were compared.                 complications  rate  to  international  data  we  found  that  our
                                                                                                          77

                                                                Central European Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology   77
                                                                            Volume 6, Supplementum 2 / November 2020
   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84