Page 168 - A Magyar Szemorvostársaság 2023. évi kongresszusa - Tudományos program és előadáskivonatok

Results: We found no significant difference in the corneal power in the flat axis (p=0.2792), in
the degree of the steep axis and the axis of the corneal astigmatism (p=0.087 and p=0.0682
respectively), but the values of the corneal power in the steep axis, of the degree of the flat
axis and of the corneal astigmatism differed significantly between ARGOS and ANTERION
(p<0.001; p=0.0079; p<0.0001 respectively). ANTERION had a 96.33% success rate in
measuring the AL and for the ARGOS the success rate was 99.47%. In one case, none of the
biometers were able to assess the AL due to the very mature cataract. In regards with the AL
measurements a significant difference was disclosed between the two devices (p = 0.0331).
For WTW, CCT and ACT measurements, a significant difference was observed between the
two SS-OCT devices (P<0.0001). While ARGOS had a 100% success rate in measuring LT,
ANTERION had 96.875% and the difference between the two optical biometers was
significant(p<0.001).

Conclusion: Both biometry devices had high success rate in evaluating axial length and lens
thickness in subjects with different degrees of lens opacity. Although our results showed a
significant difference in most of the measured parameters, more research is needed to
evaluate its clinical significance in the process of intraocular lens planning.